Posted on: 19th Apr, 2011 09:29 am
If you were evicted can you still claim adverse possession.
Hi gilbertu,
Welcome to Mortgage fit,
all these things are really complicated because status of limitation period varies from state to state.But I have found this information for you which is sufficient enough for this query.Basically you can not claim the property rights once you have evicted from the property.
here is the quote.
"If the true owner ejects the disseisor from the land, verbally or through legal action, and after some time the disseisor returns and dispossesses him again, then the statute of limitation starts over from the time of the disseisor's return. He cannot count the time between his ejection by the true property owner and the date on which he returned"
Feel free to ask any further query if you have.........
DIPA
Welcome to Mortgage fit,
all these things are really complicated because status of limitation period varies from state to state.But I have found this information for you which is sufficient enough for this query.Basically you can not claim the property rights once you have evicted from the property.
here is the quote.
"If the true owner ejects the disseisor from the land, verbally or through legal action, and after some time the disseisor returns and dispossesses him again, then the statute of limitation starts over from the time of the disseisor's return. He cannot count the time between his ejection by the true property owner and the date on which he returned"
Feel free to ask any further query if you have.........
DIPA
Dipa, please provide a source for your material. Between the original post and your response, I can't decipher quite what's going on here anyway.
Hi George,
Its wikipedia.Henceforth I will make sure to include the source because it does matter a lot from whom you are hearing/ to whom you are referring.
DIPA
Its wikipedia.Henceforth I will make sure to include the source because it does matter a lot from whom you are hearing/ to whom you are referring.
DIPA
And, of course, we all recognize that Wikipedia is only as good as the author. Honestly, I couldn't decipher the language used in what you quoted, and that was the most difficult part of it.
If you'd been quoting from a law firm's website or from a legal manual of some sort, there'd be a lot less disbelief on my part; for now, I'm still wondering what it's all about.
Thanks for the update, Dipa; it's appreciated.
If you'd been quoting from a law firm's website or from a legal manual of some sort, there'd be a lot less disbelief on my part; for now, I'm still wondering what it's all about.
Thanks for the update, Dipa; it's appreciated.