Posted on: 14th Jun, 2010 04:49 pm
My ex-wife moved out in June of 2007. Our divorce decree states that I would refy in April of 2009 and pay her half of the money. I was not able to refi due to housing market. If I tried to refi now, she believes that she still has a right to half the money. I have dome thousands of dollars of improvements to the house. Why should benefit from that since she has not lived there? How can I resolve this?
Hi kmorrow!
Welcome to forums!
As the divorce decree states that she would receive her half of the money after you sell off the property, then you can't deny her that money. It won't matter whether or not she stayed in the property. You can try and negotiate with your wife so that she agrees to lower the amount that you are about to pay her.
Feel free to ask if you've further queries.
Sussane
Welcome to forums!
As the divorce decree states that she would receive her half of the money after you sell off the property, then you can't deny her that money. It won't matter whether or not she stayed in the property. You can try and negotiate with your wife so that she agrees to lower the amount that you are about to pay her.
Feel free to ask if you've further queries.
Sussane